Destroying the real definition of marriage to buy off less than one percent of the population is tyranny. Only a drooling fool would call it "libertarian".
One can lie oneself to power, one will not lie oneself to the truth.
"There has never been more than one definition in the history of Western Civilization"
The truth is one can find in all written religious books examples of men being allowed having more than one wife and several concubines; as well as slaves.
You've changed the subject. Why must you vermin always run to religion when that is what you despise most? Marriage is a cultural institution and it has a single definition in the history of civilized peoples. It's not brother and sister. It's not two men. It's not a mother and their son.
Again, you prove you only wish to cloud the clear and dirty the pure. You seek nothing good or noble, NotmynamE. Hate is your only ethos. We'll be rid of you soon enough.
You sound depressed and pitiful, Chuck. Meds not working for ya today? Why must you use words like ´vermin´to describe someone who doesn´t agree with your point of view?
Fact of the matter, is that there is absolutely no universal definition of marriage. Not the bible, not playboy, not the Koran.
.
ReplyDeleteThis outta be good ...
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
.
Yeah. Like your spelling.
ReplyDeleteObama is a true libertarian on gay rights.
ReplyDeleteDestroying the real definition of marriage to buy off less than one percent of the population is tyranny. Only a drooling fool would call it "libertarian".
ReplyDelete.
ReplyDelete"... the real definition of marriage ..."
Whose "real" definition, Old Testament, Koran, Playboy, Book Of Mormon, et al?
Does you like me spellen better?
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
.
There has never been more than one definition in the history of Western Civilization, NotMyName.
ReplyDeleteAs always, your enemy is the truth.
.
ReplyDeleteOne can lie oneself to power, one will not lie oneself to the truth.
"There has never been more than one definition in the history of Western Civilization"
The truth is one can find in all written religious books examples of men being allowed having more than one wife and several concubines; as well as slaves.
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
.
You've changed the subject. Why must you vermin always run to religion when that is what you despise most? Marriage is a cultural institution and it has a single definition in the history of civilized peoples. It's not brother and sister. It's not two men. It's not a mother and their son.
ReplyDeleteAgain, you prove you only wish to cloud the clear and dirty the pure. You seek nothing good or noble, NotmynamE. Hate is your only ethos. We'll be rid of you soon enough.
You sound depressed and pitiful, Chuck. Meds not working for ya today? Why must you use words like ´vermin´to describe someone who doesn´t agree with your point of view?
ReplyDeleteFact of the matter, is that there is absolutely no universal definition of marriage. Not the bible, not playboy, not the Koran.
time to wake up and get over it. move on.
We'll be rid of you soon enough.
ReplyDeleteI would be curious what you mean by this statement as well. Got something planned, Chuck?
"Fact of the matter, is that there is absolutely no universal definition of marriage."
ReplyDeleteWhat other definition has there ever been, liar? You aren't very good at this, boy.